03 Change · Partner Search
Choose the right agency, through the lightest credible process.
An independent, proportionate approach to agency selection, built around evidence, fit and how the partnership will work in practice.
The problem
Too little process is quick, but hard to defend.
Too much process is rigorous in form, wasteful in practice.
The decision deserves enough evidence. Nothing more.
When it helps
Fit-First Search can be a front door. Clarification still comes first.
The method
The route determines how deeply each stage is used, not whether it happens.
01
Why change is being considered, whether search is right, what is now needed.
02
Brief, fit criteria, evidence, decision rights, timetable and agency ask.
03
Credible options, conflicts, availability and appetite, then a recommended shortlist.
04
Capability, team, evidence and commercial fit through stage-specific assessment.
05
Chemistry or Collaborative Challenge to see how the teams work together.
06
Evidence and judgement combined into a recommendation that stands up to scrutiny.
07
Commercials, contracting, transition and the first 90 days.
Same seven stages every time. Different depth, different order, depending on the route.
Search routes
A clear, contained requirement where the client needs a small set of credible options quickly.
A decision where team, cultural and working fit matter more than a speculative response.
A defined specialist need: media, digital, CRM, fundraising, production or market support.
A higher-risk appointment with greater budget, visibility, stakeholder scrutiny or procurement need.
A Collaborative Challenge is an optional assessment module inside Full Fit-First, not a separate product.
What gets assessed
Six dimensions, examined separately, each with the right evidence.
Can the agency solve the right problems at the required level?
Are the proposed people credible, available and right for the relationship?
Will the client and agency make good work together, day to day?
Is there enough compatibility, trust and productive difference?
Does the model work for the budget, scope, geography and service requirement?
Can the agency stand up the team and start delivering without avoidable disruption?
Scores structure the discussion. Evidence, comments and observed behaviour explain it.
The client outcome
A clear brief and agreed fit criteria, a focused shortlist, structured assessment materials, a reasoned recommendation, and appointment and transition support.
A focused route runs four to six weeks. A fuller process eight to twelve, depending on procurement, stakeholder availability and stages.
25+ years across media, agency leadership and 100+ pitches, both sides of the table. Independent now: no agency to sell, no pay-to-play, no outcome to defend.
No pay to participate. Small, credible shortlists. Speculative work only where it materially improves the decision. Timely, constructive feedback to all.
The outcome is not a pitch winner. It is a partner you can back.
In their words
“Andrew's depth of strategic insight and media market expertise were instrumental in guiding our agency sourcing. His knowledge of agency models and commercial structures gave us clarity and confidence in our decision-making.”
Ellie Cragg
Woodland Trust
Questions before you start?
Isn't this just another pitch consultancy? Do agencies pay to take part? How do we treat the incumbent fairly? Twelve questions, answered in one place.
Next step
A short conversation is enough to establish whether Fit-First Search is the right route, and how much process the appointment genuinely needs.
Fit-First Search sits within Partner Search, the Change stage of Mosaic's four-stage system.
Building Better Partnerships
© 2026 Mosaic Advisory Group Limited. All rights reserved.